![]() |
|||
|
Blue Book Article 1 |
|||
|
If You Choose to Raise
Sheep - Why Choose Cluns?
- by Peter Dunning
A good example of this fat issue was driven home to me a number of years ago. At the time, I was going around to some of the local agricultural fairs giving sheepdog demonstrations and selling lamb (mutton) shishkebobs and sausage. I did this primarily to utilize my own culls more economically, but I also was trying to introduce lamb to the many, many rural people that have never tasted it. Well, business had been brisk and with a large event coming up, I realized that I had no more ewes to cull. So, I called around and bought some ewes, five Hampshires from one farmer and five Cluns from a fellow breeder. My son and I butchered them as we normally did, knowing just what we wanted roughly half cubed for skewers and half ground for sausage. The dogs got the bones except the fat. And this is the killer: from the five Cluns we had a medium-sized mixing bowl of fat, and from the five Hampshires we had two five-gallon buckets full! Surprisingly, there wasn't much more meat from the Hampshires.
I think we have to ask ourselves just what do we really need in a breed. The popular breeds today, and not just sheep breeds, have been chosen primarily for just one characteristic: production. Quantity has replaced quality repeatedly. We have gigantic, grain-stuffed sheep, absurd volumes of inferior tasting milk, eggs, and meat, and fruit and vegetables that last forever, but are absolutely tasteless. Production has become the bottom line. It's time now to consider the whole animal and the whole environment. It's time to begin looking at health, longevity, vitality, hardiness, and adaptibility. This doesn't mean we disregard efficiency or economics, but it does mean a more sober evaluation of total energy utilization, a more sensitive ecological awareness, and a more frugal and humane approach to agriculture. Return to Blue Book Table of Contents
|
|
||
|
Copyright 2006 © by the NACFA - all rights reserved |
|||